Today we are going to look at an interesting and often controversial idea: Universal Basic Income, or UBI for short.
Let me ask you a question: What if the government gave everyone free money, no strings attached?
No matter who you are, where you work, or how much you earn; just regular payments, every month, guaranteed.
Does this sound too good to be true? Or maybe it sounds like a smart solution to poverty, inequality, and the future of work?
In this episode, weโll explore the concept of Universal Basic Income, discuss its goals and purpose, look at real-life experiments and trials from around the world, and examine the debate: Is UBI a brilliant ideaโฆ or a dangerous one?
Listen Here!
Interactive Transcript!
You Can Now Read and Listen at the Same Time With an Interactive Transcript!
Vocabulary
- Universal (adj): For everyone; shared by all people.
- Education is a universal right that everyone should have.
- Conditional (adj): Only happens if something else happens first.
- Her visa is conditional on having a job in the country.
- Unconditional (adj): Always given, no matter what; with no rules or limits.
- The charity gave unconditional help to anyone in need.
- No strings attached (phrase): Given freely, with no hidden rules or conditions.
- He offered to help with no strings attachedโjust because he wanted to.
- Welfare (n): Money or services the government gives to people who need help.
- She lost her job and now receives welfare to pay for food and rent.
- Automation (n): Using machines to do work instead of people.
- Automation has replaced many factory workers with robots.
- Trial (n): A test to see if something works well.
- The company ran a six-month trial of the new four-day workweek.
What is Universal Basic Income?
Universal Basic Income, often shortened to UBI, is a policy idea where every single person in a country receives a regular amount of money. This money is not a loan, itโs not a salary, and it doesnโt depend on your job or how much you earn.
Itโs simply given to you automatically, regularly, and unconditionally.
There are a few key features of UBI.
First, UBI is universal. That means it is given to everyone. Every adult citizen would receive the same amount, whether they are rich or poor, working or unemployed, living in a city or a small village.
Unlike traditional welfare systems, there is no application process or eligibility test. You donโt have to prove that you are poor or in need to get it.
Second, UBI is regular. Itโs not just a one-time payment. The idea is that the money would be delivered on a regular schedule, perhaps every month or every week, so people could depend on it as a stable and predictable part of their income.
Think of it like a basic salary from the government, just for being a citizen.
Third, and perhaps most importantly, UBI is unconditional. This means there are no strings attached. You donโt need to work a certain number of hours, attend training, or actively look for a job to qualify. The government gives you the money no matter what.
This might sound similar to other forms of government support, like welfare or unemployment benefits, but thereโs a big difference.
Traditional welfare programs are conditional: they often require you to prove that you are poor or unable to work and sometimes come with strict rules.
In contrast, UBI is unconditional. You get it whether youโre employed or unemployed, rich or poor, studying or retired. There are no requirements, no bureaucracy, and no judgment.
What is the Goal or Purpose of UBI?
Why do people support UBI? What is the goal or purpose behind giving everyone money?
The first purpose of UBI is that it aims to reduce poverty and inequality. By giving every person a guaranteed income, it provides a basic level of support that no one can fall below.
Even people with no job or unstable income would have something to rely on. It acts as a safety net, a system that helps people in difficult situations and prevents them from falling into extreme poverty.
Second, UBI is often discussed in connection with automation and the future of work. As technology advances, many traditional jobs are being done by machines and artificial intelligence.
Supporters of UBI argue that we need a new system to protect people whose jobs might disappear. I find this argument relatively convincing. I think in a previous Thinking in English episode I talked about the idea of an AI or automation tax, where companies could be taxed extra for replacing jobs with AI, and then that tax income being used to help fund Universal Basic Income.
Third, supporters of UBI argue that it can give individuals freedom and flexibility. With a guaranteed income, people might choose to pursue education, care for their children or elderly parents, or start a business without the fear of financial failure. In other words, UBI could help people build a more meaningful livelihood.
Fourth, some experts say that UBI could simplify the welfare system. In many countries, government support is extremely complicated. There are different programs for housing, food, unemployment, disability, and more, all with different requirements and paperwork. UBI could replace many of these systems with one simple, automatic payment, reducing bureaucracy and saving money on administration.
Cons of UBI
While UBI may have good intentions, not everyone believes it is the best policy or that it would even work.
The most common criticism of UBI is the cost. Giving money to every citizen, every month, would be incredibly expensive. Critics argue that governments would need to raise taxes significantly or cut other important services, like healthcare or education.
It may only be possible in wealthy, small countries, which already have high taxation (like in northern Europe).
Another concern is that if people receive money without needing to work, some may choose not to work at all. This could lead to fewer people contributing to the economy, fewer people paying taxes, and a culture where work is undervalued.
If everyone suddenly has more money to spend, prices might go up, especially for basic goods like food and housing. This is called inflation.
UBI gives money to everyone. Rich or poor. While that sounds fair, it also means that resources are not focused on those who need help the most. Traditional welfare systems often give more support to low-income or vulnerable people.
With UBI, everyone gets the same, so the rich benefit too. Some argue this makes it an inefficient use of limited public money.
Experiments and Trials
Now we know a little about the goals of UBI, and the criticisms of the policy, I think the best thing to do would be to look at some trials, experiments, and tests of the policy.
Real Policies
I guess we should start with two places that have actually introduced unconditional cash payments to citizens as a real policy.
Alaska in the USA, for example, gives all Alaskans an annual payment based on how profitable the stateโs oil production industry has been. Usually this is between $1000 and $2000 a year. They have had this policy for over 40 years.
Iran also introduced a policy similar to UBI in 2019 called the โTargeted Subsidies Reform Act.โ Basically, the government stopped or reduced subsidies in certain industries, like energy, fuel, water, and food.
To compensate for the reduced subsidies, they started transferring monthly cash payment to citizens instead. Basically, it was up to the citizens to choose where they spent the money, rather than the government.
According to the Stanford Basic Income Lab, this payment is around 29% of the median household income in Iran.
Outside of these examples, most evidence of UBI comes from trials and experiments run by academics, researchers, and charities.
Finland
Finland is a good example to look at.
Finland conducted the worldโs first nationwide randomized trial of Universal Basic Income (UBI), providing 2,000 unemployed people with a monthly, unconditional payment of โฌ560 for two years. Unlike traditional benefits, this basic income came with no requirements or obligations.
The results were notable: while the increase in employment was small, it was still statistically significant. This challenges the idea that unconditional payments reduce work motivation.
More striking, however, were the positive effects on well-being. Recipients reported higher life satisfaction, better mental health, lower stress, and greater trust in public institutions compared to a control group.
The experiment suggested that UBI could create positive feedback loops, boost confidence and enabling people to take on training, unpaid work, or job opportunities.
Kenya
Starting in 2018, about 200 villages were randomly assigned to receive cash in three different ways:
- Long-term UBI โ $22.50 per month for 12 years
- Short-term UBI โ $22.50 per month for 2 years only
- Large lump sum โ A one-time $500 payment
All three groups received roughly the same amount of money in the first 2 years. The idea was to see which method worked best to reduce poverty and improve lives.
While the trial will last until 2030, they have released some early findings.
First, people involved in the trial worked just as much as before.Critics worry that UBI might make people lazy. But this didnโt happen. Instead, people worked differently, less in agriculture, more in self-employment and small businesses.
Second, households used the money to save, invest, and earn more, especially those receiving long-term UBI or the lump sum.
Third, all groups reported lower depression, with short-term UBI showing the biggest gains. The regular income provided security and peace of mind.
Fourth, recipients ate a more diverse diet, with short-term UBI helping most with food variety.
Alcohol use didnโt increase. This is a common fear of UBI. It is often assumed that people will waste free money. But recipients in Kenya did not drink more, and some actually reported less alcohol use in their communities.
So far in the Kenyan trial, the one-time lump sum payment had the strongest impact on incomes and business creation. People used the big payment to start small enterprises and make long-term investments.
The long-term UBI gave people confidence to plan and save, since they knew more money was coming for years.
The short-term UBI was less impactful overall but still helped with food security and mental health.
And this trial will be continuing into the future, so hopefully they will be able to point out more positive results in the future.
Stockton, California
In 2019, the city of Stockton, California launched SEED (The Stockton Economic Empowerment Demonstration). The program gave 125 residents $500 per month for two years. The money was unconditional, with no strings attached and no requirement to work.
The experiment was designed to investigate some key questions: Could guaranteed income reduce income volatility? Could it improve health and well-being? Could it give people more control over their lives?
The results from the first year, before the economic mess caused by COVID-19, were impressive.
First, it reduced income volatility. Income volatility means that a personโs income changes a lot from month to month. For example, one month you might earn $2,000, but the next month only $1,200. This makes it hard to plan, save, or pay bills on time.
This helped families manage unpredictable finances.
Second, it helped more people find full-time jobs. This is important evidence against the idea that free money discourages work.
Third, participants were healthier and less stressed, showing lower rates of depression and anxiety.
Finally, it gave people more freedom to plan, take risks, and pursue goals. A number of participants found it easier to start a new job, care for family, or go back to education.
According to the researchers and organizers, the results show that guaranteed income can promote dignity, stability, and opportunity.
Other Trials
There have been many other trials of UBI around the world. The majority have taken place in the USA, but there are examples in the UK, Brazil, India, Namibia, and more.
The Stanford Basic Income Lab has a useful map for you to check out and learn more. https://basicincome.stanford.edu/experiments-map/
Final Thought
So, what have we learned today?
Universal Basic Income, or UBI, is a simple but powerful idea: giving everyone regular, unconditional money, no matter their job or income.
We explored the key goals of UBI: reducing poverty, preparing for automation, giving people more freedom, and simplifying welfare. And we looked at real-world examples from Finland, Kenya, and Stockton, which show promising results in mental health, employment, and financial stability.
But the debate is far from settled. Supporters see UBI as a tool for justice and opportunity. Critics warn of high costs, reduced work incentives, and inefficiency.
Now itโs your turn to think.
Do you believe UBI could work in your country? Would you feel more free or more dependent if you received it? And what do you think is the fairest way to support people in todayโs world?
Extended Vocabulary List
Become a Patreon Subscriber to Access the Extended Vocabulary List!
Vocabulary Games and Activities!
Learn and practice vocabulary from this Thinking in English episode.
Practice using 5 different study games and activities – including writing, listening, and memorisation techniques!
Flashcards
Matching Game
Learning Game
Test Yourself
Listening and Spelling
Do you want to Think in English?
I’m so excited that you found my blog and podcast!! If you donโt want to miss an article or an episode, you can subscribe to my page!


